Major League Four

Location: Brooklyn, NY

Wednesday, May 25, 2005

A-Rod has A-Problem

So A-Rod moves to New York and all of a sudden becomes Woody Allen. Go figure. I guess forcing a trade to a team that actually cares about performance and then going out and making no friends on OR off the field takes it's toll. And then there's that whole "slappy" fiasco. And the fact that he's FOREVER the poster boy for the Greatest Choke Job in Sports History(tm).

Yeah, that's grounds for some time on the couch...

Cal n' Bono, sitting in a tree...

So a few months ago, ESPN's usually fantasmic columnist Bill Simmons wrote a completely ridiculous article ( on how there was no musical equivalent to U2. He's wrong, and I told him so. This was going to fit under my Orioles season preview - because really, who wants to read about Sammy Sosa anymore - but since I gave up on it before I got that far, here it goes...

I've been an avid reader since the old BSG days. Over the last few years, when something important, exciting, repulsive – or most importantly, hilarious – happens in the sports world, one of my first thoughts is “I can't wait to find out what Simmons will have to say about this.” When the Sox went on their playoff run, causing The Biggest Choke in Sports History, you were one of the few writers/fans who captured the moment perfectly. The same with the Pats Super Bowls. And the C's. And the NBA draft. And…well, the list goes on. Bill, when it comes to sports…you know your stuff. When it comes to television…you know your stuff. When it comes to relationships…you know your stuff. When it comes to being a “guy”…you know your stuff. When it comes to movies…you (generally) know your stuff. But please, as a reader, a fan, and a friend of a few friends…when it comes to music…you have no idea what you're talking about.

I'm sorry. I hate to say it, but it's true. I first questioned your music knowledge/taste a long time ago when you bitched about how The Counting Crows sound different live than in person. The Counting Crows, Bill? The Counting Crows are the chick flick of bands. I was a freshman in college in the fall of 1994. You have no idea how many times I heard “Anna Begins” wafting out of the dorm room of some emoting Freshman girl who missed her boyfriend. “A Long December?” There might as well be a Meg Ryan movie with that title. Bill, if one of your friends copped to enjoying a movie where one character says to the other “Every time she sneezes I believe its love,” you'd buy him the Doug Christie jersey in 6.3 seconds. When I think about the Counting Crows, I always come back to one thing. Back when my ladyfriend was in college, I remember talking to her on the phone. She said her and her best friend had come from a CD store where her best friend bought some rap CDs and a Counting Crows CD? “Counting Crows?” I asked. “Yeah, she likes to listen to them when she's PMSing” my girlfriend told me. PMSing. She couldn't even handle them in a normal mood.

But this isn't about how lame Adam Duritz is. This is about your column about U2. But before we get to the sports equivalent of U2, let's first take care of something else you wrote in the column…

“With sports, there is nothing to do but argue about this stuff. If music were sports, Kornheiser and Wilbon would be fighting to the death over "Who's better: Franz Ferdinand or The Killers?" But we don't approach music this way…

Now by “we” I can only assume you mean “you.” I spend an inordinate amount of time arguing about music with friends – as a good amount of people in New York do. At the bar, playing cards, watching baseball…it doesn't matter where. And as for the Kornheiser and Wilbon thing, each week in Chicago, music critics Jim DeRogatis and Greg Kot do the same thing on the radio with “Sound Opinions” – “The world's ONLY rock n roll talk show.” And considering both Kot and DeRogatis have the Franz Ferdinand record in their top 10 of last year and NOT the Killers record pretty much answers your question about who's the “better” band. But to put it into terms you'll understand better, let's go back in time to the NBA of the mid 90's.

Franz Ferdinand are Grant Hill. They're seasoned, intelligent and stylish. They take the best bits of players from the past and spin them in new and original ways. While there are elements of Franz Ferdinand and '95 Grant Hill that remind you of those that came before them, despite being rookies, they've already cemented a place in music/NBA lore.

The Killers? The Killers are Glenn Robinson. They're a complete and total product of the era. Sure they'll give you 20 and 10 for a few years and make a few all-star teams, but that's about it. Their style – Duran Duran keyboards, Strokes chic and songs about androgynous sexy people VS. a shaved head and baggy shorts – just reminds you of everyone else of the era. Their game is marginally better, but so what? Not to mention that you refer to Robinson as Glenn “I stole Antoine Carr's nickname” Robinson, while most music fans think of The Killers as “that band that completely rips off Pulp.” At best The Killers will be another Stone Temple Pilots of the 00's to The Strokes' Nirvana. Totally catchy and worth listening to, but in 10 years they'll be a footnote. In other words, you'll be telling your kids about Grant Hill and not Glenn Robinson, while I'm playing my kids the first Franz Ferdinand record and not the first Killers record.

Now as far as U2 goes, you can't possibly take a subjective look at the issue because you're a rabid U2 fan. Obviously you think no athlete – not even Jordan (aka The Beatles) – can compare to them. The same way that anyone would have a tough time convincing me that Pavement aren't the equal of Sandy Koufax.

But U2 has a perfect athlete equivalent. Bill, you're just too much of a U2 fan – and not to mention too much of a NON-fan of their jock doppelganger.

U2 is Cal Ripken Jr. That's right, Cal f'n Ripken Jr.

Right now you're head is exploding. You're filled with rage because I compared the band that shaped your life with an athlete you think is overrated and deserves much less attention than he deserves. This is how you feel as a REAL SPORTS FAN. The same way a lot of REAL MUSIC FANS feel that U2 is overrated. And by REAL FAN I mean someone that spends as much time listening to and/or reading about music as you do with sports.

And I know you think people don't argue about music, but let's check this out for a second.

1960: Both Bono and Cal Ripken Jr. are born. Coincidence? I think not.

1980-1982: U2 become big in Ireland and the UK before finally breaking into the American music scene with “I Will Follow” and “Gloria” – becoming one of the biggest “up and coming” bands around. Meanwhile, Cal Ripken jumps from the Rochester Red Wings to the big leagues, winning the 1982 American League Rookie of the Year award.

1983: Both hit the big time. Cal Ripken wins the AL MVP award and his Baltimore Orioles win the World Series. He's well on his way to becoming the most POPULAR baseball player of the 1980s. U2 relase “War,” becoming international superstars thanks to “Sunday Bloody Sunday,” “New Year's Day,” and “40.” They're well on their way to becoming the most POPULAR band of the 1980s.

1984-1987: Now this is where U2 fans will throw their arms in the air and get as frustrated as Bono talking about genocide and fair trade. They'll say that this is where the similarities end. That in order for Cal Ripken to equal U2, then he'd have to have pantheon level seasons in 1984 and 1987 to match “The Unforgettable Fire” and “The Joshua Tree.” But again, that's just the way U2 fans will look at it. To the rest of us, it's simple…

From 1984 to 1987 U2 was the MOST POPULAR rock band on the planet while Cal Ripken Jr. was the MOST POPULAR baseball player on the planet. And yes, you can also make a case that during this time U2 was the best band, and Cal the best baseball player. Though you could more accurately say that U2 were the best mainstream rock band and Cal Ripken was the best shortstop. As for fame, U2 would routinely sell out stadiums, while Cal pretty much led all of baseball in all-star voting for all of these years.

During these years, players like Andre Dawson, George Bell, Kirby Puckett, Tony Gwynn, Don Mattingly, Mike Schmidt and others put up equal and/or better numbers than Cal, but he was more “popular” than all of them. Also during these years, bands like Sonic Youth, The Smiths, R.E.M, The Replacements, The Cure, Metallica, Echo and the Bunnymen and others ALSO released great music that stands the test of time. Only none of them were as POPULAR as U2.

1988: The low points. Cal's Orioles start the season without winning for practically all of April. They finish 54-107. Also, bad publicity for the Ripken clan as Cal's less-talented brother Billy appears on a baseball card with “F@#$ Face” written on his bat. Meanwhile, U2 release the pompous movie/album “Rattle and Hum” and become caricatures of a superstar rock band. “Ok Edge, play the blues!”, “Charles Manson stole this song from the Beatles, tonight we're stealing it back.” Yuck. Meanwhile more exciting, drug fueled rivals such as Jose Canseco and Guns N' Roses steal the spotlight.

1991: The comebacks. Given up for past his prime, Cal Ripken wins the AL MVP award for a second time and finds himself back on the cover of Sports Illustrated. U2 reemerge with the brilliant “Achtung Baby.” Meanwhile, Cal's reign as the most POPULAR player around starts to fade as a new breed of player – Barry Bonds, Ken Griffey Jr. – takes shape. Meanwhile, Guns N' Roses, Metallica, and eventually Nirvana and Pearl Jam t-shirts take place of all the U2 ones in my high school.

1992-2000: Cal tarnishes his reputation as he plays (often poorly) everyday just to break Lou Gherig's streak of the most games played. In 1995, he breaks the record and is celebrated (rightfully so) for his past accomplishments. Meanwhile, U2 release the annoyingly experimental “Zooropa” and then in 1997, the rather unlistenable “Pop.” They go on an enormous, big selling tour where they are celebrated (rightfully so) for their past accomplishments.

2001: In the weeks after September 11 th , Cal Ripken retires, cementing his place as a hard-working, All-American hero and touching media story. Around the same time, U2 releases “Beautiful Day,” and become similar American media heroes – despite (I'm pretty sure) still being Irish. Again, U2 fans will take offense to this comparison because U2 released a “great U2 album” and Cal Ripken simply retired. However it can be argued that U2 simply releasing a “great U2 album” is hardly revelatory.

2002-2004: Cal Ripken enjoys retirement, only coming out to appear in annoying commercials for (among other things), potato chips and a budget electronics store he'll never step foot in. Meanwhile, U2 resurface in the form of an annoying ipod commercial. Bill, you know how you felt every time you heard “You're risking a patient's life!” during the 2004 playoffs? Well I thought about smashing the few U2 records I owned every time I heard Bono yell “Hello, Helooooooo” between every inning silhouetted in purple. Cal and Bono don't need the money, they just share the sentiment of not wanting to be forgotten.

Which brings us to, as you put it, “the success of ‘Vertigo'.” Bill, do you really find it surprising that a song by a famous band that appears in a commercial every five minutes became a major hit? Are you kidding? And forgetting about the last three pages, “Vertigo” actually sums up the correlation between U2 and Cal Ripken, in that…

“Vertigo” is a great song to people who like U2, while Cal Ripken is a great baseball player to people who like Cal Ripken.

It's that simple. Both U2 and Cal Ripken have rabid fans (have you been to Baltimore????), but are better known to “casual” fans of baseball or music. From 1983-2001, if you asked a casual music fan what they listen to, chances are they'd say, “well I kind of like U2.” And during the same time if you asked a casual baseball fan who they liked, chances are they'd say “well I kind of like Cal Ripken.” U2 and Cal Ripken are the safe, sanitized, mainstream choice for people who don't bother digging deeper. And that's not a rip against either of them.

Both U2 and Ripken are first ballot hall-of-famers. Both U2 and Ripken were the face of their resepective crafts for the 1980's. Both U2 and Ripken faded for the better part of the 90's. Both had a bit of the spotlight in 2001. And now? U2 is still milking the act of being U2 and Cal ripken is still milking the act of being Cal Ripken. You think Cal Ripken would be playing baseball if 45-year olds could still play? Instead he just announced that he'll be doing a radio show on XM Satellite radio with his brother Billy. And if satellite radio becomes a success, do you think there's any way Bono WON'T be promoting the new U2 record on it in 2009? Bono and The Edge will pop up on an internet radio station to play some exclusive songs from their new album that U2 fans claim as a “return to form?” And Bill it doesn't matter if you'll have XM or not. U2 will be there with Cal Ripken. With or without you.

The finger and the boot

So Danny Graves flips off a fan and gets kicked to the curb. Ok, this is the second time in a week that the REDS(tates) have essentially released a player for bad behavior. It's a nice sentiment and all, but there's something very family values about the whole thing. Fishy. But since dumping Danny the Reds are 2-0, and of course Graves will wind up on a contender instead of last place, so everyone wins.

In other news...

The thought definitely crossed the mind of every Red Sox fan that Ramiro Mendoza was still collecting Yankee paycheks while blowing games for the Sox. I'm not saying that David Wells is too, but jeez.

Javy Lopez is out six weeks. If the Orioles are still in first when he takes the field again, Lee Mazilli should win the Manager of the Year trophy then and there.

Brett Myers shuts down the Marlins for 7 innings, then they score 4 times from the 8th to the 10th, beating Billy Wagner in the process. That's six in a row. Finally.

The second place Brewers are a game below .500. Read that again.

Adam Eaton is 7-1. If you knew that, you're probably his Mom.

The Giants won and everyone's all happy because they're hanging around .500 and Mr. Happy Pants is on his way back from his totally non-steroid related injuries. A nice story and all, but I don't think Jason Schmidt and Mike Matheny will be hitting homers to win games in October. Just a hunch.

Monday, May 23, 2005

Interleague Madness!

Went to the Mets-Yankees game yesterday. Great game until the Mets remembered that they weren't supposed to win in the first place. The two 7th inning errors were one thing - that's what happens when the left side of your infield has a combined age of about 22 - but there's one thing I can't understand. WHY? WHY? WHY? would they pitch to Matsui with a base open and Bernie on deck? Does Willie Randolph not get the YES network? Just wondering.

Other notes...

1. Between Jeff Weaver and Javier Vasquez, don't you think that Mel Stottlemyre should take SOME of the blame for their NY failures? Pitching for the Yankees can't have THAT much pressure. And aside from Tanyon Sturtze, name one pitcher who came to the Yankees in the last 10 years who's had their best years in the Bronx. Tough one, right?

2. Peter Angelos is obviously peeved that the Nationals took away some of the crowd at his Orioles games, but why would he put his foot down on an Interleague matchup? He'd rather play the Phillies? Dumb, dumb, dumb.

3. Just because I forgot to mention this earlier...Shea Hillenbrand is the new Todd Zeile.

4. And yes, that was 16 shutout innings yesterday from Chan Ho Park and Aaron Sele. Makes me want to pick up a curveball.

Tuesday, May 17, 2005

About last night...

1. I'm amazed K-Rod made it through two whole seasons before a) being named closer and b) getting injured.

2. I'm equally amazed that Cliff Floyd has 11 homers in mid-May. He hasn't stubbed a toe in weeks!

3. The Yankees have won 9 in a row thanks to Tino and Bernie. Think how bad they'd be with Beltran on board.

4. The Padres have climbed into a tie for first. Don't expect them to leave any time soon.

5. Brian Moehler? He's got a 2.17 ERA as the Marlins fifth starter...and the team is only 20-15. How is this possible? They should have the best record in baseball. End of story.

6. The Red Sox left 13 men on base in Oakland. I think 16 of them by Edgar Renteria. Actually that's not fair...they had FIVE players leave at least 4 men on base. Were they just waiting for Dotel to come in? Didn't matter...they're just not playing well right now.

A short break

So I told myself that I'd actually keep up with the writing this season, but apparently that didn't work so good. Now here we are a month and a half into the season and I've already missed a number of things to comment on. I mean the Yankees actually did suck for a good chunk of the season and I missed it all. Poop. Had I been keeping up with the season, here's what I probably would have said about a few things...

1. The White Sox
I'm quite happy about their resurgence. After all, how many teams begin a season without three of their four best players from the previous season (Magglio, Carlos Lee and the injured Frank Thomas) and go on a tear. Plus you HAVE to love Scott Podsednik. A little white guy who's doing his dardnest to steal 100 bases? Who knew. And when the rotation features two guys the Yankees smuggled into the U.S on rafts and then kicked to the curb, well, what's not to like?

2. The Orioles
I liked them going into the season - but then again I thought the Blue Jays would win the East last year. Did I think they'd be in first in mid-May? Hell no. Do I think they'll be in September? Hell no. I don't think the Bruce Chen experience can last much longer. And the temporary outfield of Newhan, Gibbons and Fiorentino doesn't look too promising. But it's a start...and if Miguel Tejada didn't complain about Derek Lowe's "obscene gesture" in the 2003 ALDS, then I might like him even more.

3. The Dodgers
I'm completely shocked at how good they've been...and so have you.

4. The Diamondbacks
I'm not completely shocked at this - even though they were low in the preview. No expectations, nice additions, a coaching staff completely nicked from my '87 Topps set. Two thumbs up, way up.

5. The steroids.
So Mr. Beltre, Seattle isn't so close to Mexico, is it? And I really hope that all those guys on the Indians weren't strictly good on account of the juice.

And if it turns out that "the" Aaron Boone homer (as well as the two Giambi homers) in game 7 of the ALCS was steroid-aided, well, that wouldn't be too fun. Like brother, like brother, right?

Monday, March 28, 2005

2005 Season Preview - Team #17 - Seattle Mariners

The 2005 Mariners are tough to read. They made some good additions, and if everyone's healthy they could actually give the Angels a run for their money, but right now there are a lot of question marks...

Was Adrian Beltre's 2004 a fluke?
Is Richie Sexson fully healed?
Are the 'roids completely gone from Bret Boone's system?
Are Pokey Reese and Miguel Olivo everyday players?
Is Joel Piniero healthy?
Is Gil Meche healthy?
Is Eddie Guardado healthy?
Is Jamie Moyer still any good?

See, that's eight questions right there and I only spent about 5 minutes on this.

2005 Season Preview - Team #18 - Texas Rangers

Aside from a few years when they weren't very good at all, I feel like the Rangers have had the same story since I started following baseball in the early 80's. Above average hitting + below average pitching = a team possibly good enough to make the playoffs but not even close to making a dent against a balanced team. So why should this year be any different?

2005 Season Preview - Team #19 - Los Angeles Dodgers

(Ok, enough of adding pictures to this blog. I have a "real" job.)

Anyway, the Dodgers. No sir, I don't like it. First off, Adrian Beltre absolutely carried the offense last year - and when he didn't, Shawn Green was there to pick things up. Now they're both gone. So, let's take a look at some of the names the Dodgers will be putting on the field this season...

* Jeff Kent (Tough to get along with, not getting any younger)
* J.D Drew (Tough to get along with, ridiculous Jesus freak, has had ONE healthy season, looks surprisingly skinny this year)
* Milton Bradley (Complete psycho, can't go 10 minutes without being suspended, is possibly being moved to RF to accomodate Drew)
* Jose Valentin (Can't field, might not be able to hit in Dodger Stadium)
* Derek Lowe (Great when on, but has the demeanor of a little leaguer when he gets rattled)
* Hee Seop Choi (Hit .160 with 0 HR after coming to LA at last year's trading deadline)
* Brad Penny (Barely pitched after coming to LA at last year's trading deadline)
* Jeff Weaver (Streaky stoner)
* Jason Phillips (Sucked for the Mets last year)
* Eric Gagne (Best closer in baseball...but messed up his knee in spring training and looked HORRIBLE last week)

So you still think they'll be any good this year?

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

2005 Season Preview - Team #20 - Oakland A's

If they’re any good this year, then Billy Beane belongs in the Hall of Fame immediately.

Monday, March 14, 2005

(Somewhat) Baseball-free Movie Review: Mr. 3000

I like baseball movies and I like Bernie Mac, but man, did I dislike Mr. 3000. It's a comedy that's not funny. It's a baseball movie with lame baseball. It's a movie with a script that plays out like a page-by-page example of how to write a Hollywood movie. I'd keep going, but it's not worth my time. Stay away, stay very far away.

* and 1/2

2005 Season Preview - Team #21 - Houston Astros

Until Lance Berkman gets back from injury – and possibly after he gets back – the Astros will most likely have the worst offense in baseball. Maybe Kansas City or Pittsburgh can hang with them, but I’m not so sure. The team that came within a few outs of the World Series last year is gone. And by team I mean “Carlos Beltran.” Seriously, is anyone in this lineup going to scare people? Bagwell and Biggio are finished, and everyone else ranges from those too old to be considered prospects (Ensberg, Lane) to those who were never good to begin with (Ausmus, Vizcaino, Orlando Palmeiro). As for the pitching, Oswalt is still the cat’s nutsac, but Pettitte is damaged goods, Brandon Backe reeks of Jaret Wright/John Lackey-itis, and Roger Clemens will be on the Yankees by mid-July. Can you say rebuilding?

2005 Season Preview - Team #22 - Arizona Diamondbacks

The good news: Adding Troy Glaus, Javier Vazquez, Russ Ortiz and Shawn Green could be huge. If they all return to form, that’s four (one-time) all-stars they didn’t have last year. The bad news: Their three best hitters (Glaus, Green and Luis Gonzalez – “The Killer G’s” anyone?) are all coming off injury. The worse news: The rest of the team is pretty crappy.

Thursday, March 10, 2005

2005 Season Preview - Team #23 - Detroit Tigers

Remember the days when free agents would happily sign with teams all over the United States and not just coastal teams with large cable TV deals? The days of Cy Young winners like Mark Davis signing with Kansas City are long over. (Though maybe Davis knew he’d be injured and horrible and therefore chose to pitch away from the spotlight.) Anyway, it sucks for the Tigers to know that the only way they’ll sign a marquee name is by overpaying them AFTER they can’t find a job anywhere else. And early signee Troy Percival hardly counts because he’s just not that good anymore.

That said, the tigers could surprise some people this year, since the AL Central should be a pretty easy division to hang around in. If their young pitching staff turns it up a bit, and reluctant/question marked Tigers Magglio Ordonez (messed up knee) and Pudge Rodriguez (lost 20 pounds of "muscle") play up to their usual level, then the Tigers might finally be as good as their new stadium.

Baseball-free Album Review: Doves - Some Cities

It seems that English trio Doves (Dude, where’s the “The”?) got the memo that the best bits of their last album – the most excellent “The Last Broadcast” – were epic buildup monsters like “Satellites,” “There Goes the Fear,” and the blood rushing, stadium-ready soccer anthem “Pounding.” Therefore, nearly every song on “Some Cities” features the same formula, which makes for a catchy, fun and ultimately repetitive affair. Yes, we all love the “Be My Baby” drumbeat and perfectly chiming guitars, but what happened to the diversity that made “Broadcast” and their spectacularly moody debut “Lost Souls” so enjoyable?

When “Some Cities” is on – like in the sublime title track, and the way “Sky Starts Falling” spins a typically-Dovesish track into a surprisingly noisy direction – you feel the magic that more often than not makes this band soar. But too much of the same, as well as a few missteps (“The Storm” sounds exactly like Portishead, and I doubt even Portishead wants to sound like Portishead anymore), makes it a slight letdown.


2005 Season Preview - Team #24 - Milwaukee Brewers

Poor Milwaukee. Unlike the Devil Rays, the Brewers actually do have fans. But like the Devil Rays, the Brewers play in a tough division and don’t stand much of a chance at making the playoffs. The only difference is that if they keep some of these guys around for a few years – and if uber-kids Rickie Weeks and Prince Fielder are as good as advertised – they could leap frog up to the top. But if Ben Sheets bolts for the Yankees, Red Sox or other marquee team, then it’s back to square one.

As for 2005, I really like the moves they made – sending a journeyman “all-star” closer and poor hitting speedster Scott Posedsksinkcicnnnkick for a studly pitching prospect and Carlos Lee. If Miller Park makes Richie Sexson look like Pedro Cerrano, then Lee’s got a good shot at a pretty sick season.

2005 Season Preview - Team #25 - Tampa Bay Devil Rays

If MLB decided to get rid of the Devil Rays, would anyone care? More importantly, how many people would even notice? The Rays might actually not be so terrible this year, but so what? They have 38 fans and they play in a division with three teams that spend money and another with a talented G.M. So basically they have no chance. Not this year, not next year, not ever. Get rid of them. Nobody will know.

2005 Season Preview - Team #26 - Toronto Blue Jays

Last year I wrote my usual MLB season preview for Flipped Online (, only for whatever reason I never sent it to my “editors.” I think it was because I was away for the week leading up to the season and didn’t write it until the middle of the first week – and didn’t feel right about “cheating” like that. After all, even a few days worth of watching games gives you a sense of who’s good and who’s not. Then again maybe I didn’t send it because I picked the Red Sox to finish in third place and didn’t want to be right about that – or seem wrong if they ended up being good. But why did I pick the Sox to finish third? Because I thought the Blue Jays were going to the World Series. Yup. I thought they’d surprise everyone and lose to the Cubs in the fall classic. And never was I more happy to be wrong – for the sake of the Sox, not the Blue Jays. After all, it would be nice if the Sky Dome was actually full of people again. But no. Halladay got hurt, Delgado slumped, Hinske vanished, and the rest of the pitching staff – which I thought would be great since in 2003, Lilly, Hentgen and Towers all KILLED the Red Sox – really just fell flat. The Jays finished in last and until now my boldly stupid prediction was in hiding. This year I’m not falling for it again – though since they actually look bad on paper this time around, maybe they’ll actually be good this year.